Cooking the Book… on Corporate Accountability and… Wanting to be accoun… on Corporate Accountability and… How to become accoun… on Corporate Accountability and… don543 on Corporate Accountability and… Garrett on Corporate Accountability and…
The European Union (EU) is a political partnership that represents a cooperative economic relationship between 28 member countries. The member countries are composed of Central and Eastern Europe. The member countries work together to set policies and to promote their collective interests. While the scope of EU decision making varies depending on the subject being reviewed, for matters of economic and most social concern, the members have agreed to a collective process. As part of the accord, the member countries share a single market that allows people, products, and capital to move freely between the members. With the exception of nine member countries including Britain, the EU shares a common currency called the Euro. Lithuania became the most recent country to join the Eurozone on January 1, 2015 (Archick, 2016).
Formation of the European Union
The “Single European Act” of 1986 was the first modification of the acting treaties for the European countries. It impacted the Treaty of Paris signed in 1951 and the Treaties of Rome, signed in 1957. The 1986 Act provided several important steps for the unification of Europe. First, it approved or legitimized the “European Council” which acted as a committee where heads of state or their designee could meet for formal negotiations. The primary goal of the accord was to establish a common market which included a shared monetary policy. In addition to pursuing a “common market” the act also addressed integration of social rights. The signing of the 1986 Act was the first step toward a 1992 target for full integration (Historiasiglo20.org, 2003).
According to Hill (2014, pg 264-265), the “Single European Act” was “born of frustration among members, that the European Council was not living up to its promise to improve economic activity between the member countries.” By the early 1980’s the European Council had failed to adequately remove barriers that prevented free trade and investment. Additionally, technical and legal standards needed for economic growth remained unfinished. As a result, prominent business leaders mounted a campaign to end the European Council’s economic division. This resulted in the establishment of the Delors Commission.
The Delors Commission is generally seen as the most successful at advancing European integration. The commission proposed that all impediments to the formation of a single market be eliminated by December 31, 1992. The result was the single European Act which was signed in 1986 and became law in 1987. The Delors Commission was named after the key figure, Jacques Delors. He started his career at the Banque de France in 1945 before being appointed General Secretary for Permanent Training and Social Promotion (1969-1973). He was a member of Prime Minister Jacques Chaban-Delmas’s cabinet (1969-1972). He was elected as a Member of the European Parliament in 1979. Delors was also President of the Economic Monetary Affairs Committee of the European Parliament from 1979 to 1981. Prior to this, he had served as the Minister of Finance and Economy in France. In October 1996, Jacques Delors founded the think tank Notre Europe, today known as the Jacques Delors Institut (Jacques Delors Institute, 2016).
The “Single European Act” was not without its detractors. Most notably, Margaret Thatcher, was outspoken about her agenda to shrink the government’s involvement in both economic and social welfare. Thatcher saw the “Single European Act” as a step in the wrong direction. In September 20, 1988, Thatcher shared her views at the College of Europe in Bruges Belgium.
“My first guiding principle is this: willing and active cooperation between independent sovereign states is the best way to build a successful European Community. To try to suppress nationhood and concentrate power at the centre of a European conglomerate would be highly damaging and would jeopardise the objectives we seek to achieve. Europe will be stronger precisely because it has France as France, Spain as Spain, Britain as Britain, each with its own customs, traditions and identity. It would be folly to try to fit them into some sort of identikit European personality…” – (Thatcher 1988)
Jacques Delors rebuttal to Thatcher took place the following year at the College of Europe in Brussels. Delors famously stated “History is accelerating and we should make it with her…” (Historiasiglo20.org, 2003). Delors had the advantage of a seismic change in world politics. On November 9, 1989 the Berlin Wall fell. The Berlin Wall was constructed to stop the flow of immigrants between East and West Berlin and came to symbolize the political division between a free market and communism. The Berlin Wall was created under the authority of Premier Khrushchev and did successfully stop the flow of immigrants but it also isolated the West Berlin residents leading up to the Berlin Wall Blockade and the subsequent Berlin Airlift (History.com, 2016).
On June 12, 1987, in his speech at Brandenburg Gate West Berlin, Germany, President Ronald Reagan famously stated “Mr. Mikhail Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!” (Air University, 2016). The symbolic and literal destruction of the Berlin Wall was the precursor to the eventual collapse of the Soviet Union which occurred in 1991.
The first European ramification of the collapse of the soviet block was the reunification of Germany, now the German Federal Republic. With approximately 80 million citizens the reunited Germany now represented a significant portion of economic muscle. Now larger than either Britain or France the newly minted country was a potential risk for some. Francois Mitterand, the President of France, used the reunified Germany as a means to encourage the European integration process. His logic was based on the assumption that a Germany securely attached to the European Union (EU) would be less of a potential future risk. Helmut Kohl, the Chancellor for Germany, also pushed for European Integration as a means to both display its new political muscle and to quiet any potential fears or hostility toward the country. This shared goal, between France and Germany, for integration of the EU was known as the “French-German Axis”. In a common message the two leaders drafted a single letter…
“In the light of far-reaching changes in Europe and in view of the completion of the single market and the realisation of economic and monetary union, we consider necessary to accelerate the political construction of the Europe of the Twelve. We think that this is the right moment to transform the whole of the relationships among the member States into an European Union and to endow it of the necessary means of action.” (Archick, 2016)
After several years of continued debate and discussion, the Treaty of Maastricht was signed and came into force February 7, 1992. The actual debated and negotiations surrounding the European Councils work was criticised for low levels of transparency and the fact that it was restricted to high level political officials (Historiasiglo20.org, 2003).
What Is the Euro and the Eurozone Crisis?
Nineteen of the EU’s member countries share a common single currency. Together they are often referred to as “the Eurozone.” The introduction of the euro began in January 1999. In addition to a shared currency, Eurozone countries also share a common central bank, the European Central Bank (ECB). While the member countries share common monetary policy they do not share fiscal policies. Each member country exercises their independence in establishing spending and taxation policy (Archick, 2016).
The “Eurozone Crisis” began as a “debt crisis” in Greece during 2009-2010. In 2009 investors became nervous about the amount of debt that the Greek government held. The prevailing wisdom at the time, thought the debt was too high. As a result the markets demanded higher interest rates for Greek bonds, which in turn drove up the cost to borrow, which further aggravated the Greek debt crisis. In 2012 the Eurozone crisis began to reduce in intensity. This diminished intensity was largely the result of the recovering markets. Named “Grexit”, in 2015, the anti-austerity party used the potential Greek exit from the EU as a negotiating tactic, requesting debt relief and relaxing the austerity measures put into place (Archick, 2016).
The Schengen Area
The Schengen Area refers to 22 EU members including Britain. Within the Schengen Area internal border controls have been eliminated, allowing individuals to travel without passport. The Schengen area is based on the Schengen Agreement of 1985. Named after the town it was signed in. In 1999, the Schengen Accord was adopted into EU law. In addition to eliminating internal borders, participants countries agreed to improve coordination between their criminal justice authorities. As part of that strategy they created the Schengen Information System (SIS) a “large-scale information database that enables police, border guards, and other law enforcement and judicial authorities to enter and consult alerts on certain categories of persons and objects.” Both Ireland and the UK opted out of the Schengen free movement area but still take part in some forms of the agreement related to criminal justice collaboration, including access to the SIS (Archick, 2016).
The conflicting opinions of member countries demonstrates a growing divide between those members that want a closer affiliation through greater integration and those members that prefer to keep the EU as an intergovernmental process so that they may better protect their national sovereignty. Despite this conflict many members still report that the EU strengthens both their political and economic clout. Regardless, tensions continue within the EU. This is evident by the June 23, 2016 referendum held in the United Kingdom. During the referendum, 52.5% of the vote supported the UK in exiting the UE (Wheeler, 2016).
Britex is the shorthand term most commonly used to reference Britain leaving the EU. Now that the referendum has been passed the next steps are uncertain. According to Wheeler of the BBC (2016), Britain has to invoke Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty. The Prime Minister, our his successor will need to decide when to make that decree. Article 50 has only been active since 2009 and no country has yet used it, so no one really knows how the Britex process will work. What is know is that Britain will continue to remain a member of the EU until it no longer is and that might take some time.
In large part the EU was created to establish a single European market and this accomplishment is seen by many as its greatest asset. The concept of the single market was to increase trade, create jobs and lower prices. Peter Mandelson famously said “the markets don’t like instability and they don’t like uncertainty”. The whole concept of Britain exiting the UE creates all kinds of uncertainty. According to Buttonwood (2016), a columnist for the economist.com, as soon as the results of the referendum began to come in, the markets responded. The pound dropped to its lowest level since 1985. “It was the worst day for sterling since the currency floated in the early 1970s.” The impact was also felt in equity markets around the world. The Nikkei 225 average in Tokyo dropped by an initial 8%. The Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE) 100 dropped 500 points within minutes of the opening; Frankfurt’s DAX index fell 8.6%. S&P futures indicate a 5% drop, and the US Treasury 10-year bond yield fell a quarter of a point in overnight trading. Uncertainty has real economic impact and both businesses and investors will remain conservative by postpone investment plans until they have a clear picture of what this will mean.
Another unknown is what impact Britex will have on pensions, savings, and mortgages. During the referendum, the Prime Minister referenced the “triple lock for state pensions” would be jeopardized. This references an agreement that increases pensions by a minimum of the level of earnings, inflation or by 2.5% depending on which is highest (Wheeler, 2016). Some have speculated that the Bank of England might need to increase further plans for quantitative easing, as an alternative to cutting interest rates. This would result in lower bond yields and annuity rates. This would have a negative impact on anyone taking out a pension annuity resulting in less income. Concerning mortgage cost, the prime minister stated that the average cost of a mortgage could increase by up to £1,000 a year (Wheeler, 2016).
It took years for the EU to evolve and become a single market. The concept of the single EU market was to increase trade, create jobs and lower prices. Britain’s exit from the EU creates all kinds of uncertainty. Uncertainty about how the exit will impact jobs, pensions, and other financial tools. This uncertainty leads to financial instability. “Markets don’t like instability and they don’t like uncertainty”. We are already seeing the financial impact of that uncertainty, not just in Europe but around the world. Another assumption is that because it took years for the EU to evolve, it may very well take years for Britain to fully withdraw from the EU. This prolonged process will further dampen the British economy, as uncertainty and instability remain a common issue. When the impact of this decision finally hits home, meaning when the average citizen begins to feel its impact, we may very well see another referendum.
About the Author
Jerry Landers is the Executive Director for Aspire Indian Health and Vice President of Business Development for Aspire Indiana. You can learn more about the mission of Aspire at http://www.AspireIndiana.org or by following me on Twitter @JerryELanders
I blog and tweet about health care, business and social media.
Air University (2016). President Ronald Reagan – Berlin. “Tear Down This Wall” Retrieved from http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/awc-ref.htm#speeches
Archick, K (2016). The European Union: Questions and Answers. Congressional Research Service 7-5700 RS 21372 Retrieved from https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RS21372.pdf
Buttonwood (2016). Brexit and the markets: a seismic shock. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/blogs/buttonwood/2016/06/morning-after
Hill, C. W. L. (2014). International business: Competing in the global marketplace (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Historiasiglo20.org (2003) The Single European Act and the road toward the Treaty of the European Union (1986-1992). Retrieved from http://www.historiasiglo20.org/europe/acta.htm
History.com (2016). Berlin Wall. Retrieved from http://www.history.com/topics/cold-war/berlin-wall
Giaque, Jeffrey Glen. 2002. Grand Designs & Visions of Unity: The Atlantic Powers and the
Reorganization of Western Europe, 1955-1963. Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North
Jacques Delors Institute (2016). Jacques Delors – Founding President of the Jacques Delors Institute. Retrieved from http://www.delorsinstitute.eu/011016-2033-Jacques-Delors.html
Kiplinger Letter (2016). Forecast for Executives and Investors. Washington DC Vol. 93, No. 25
Lind, J. (2003). “Apologies and Threat Reduction in Postwar Europe.” Paper prepared for delivery at the Memory of Violence Workshop, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, January 24-25, 2003 Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/rpeters/papers/lind_apologies.pdf
Thatcher, M (1988). Speech to the College of Europe (“The Bruges Speech”). Retrieved from http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/107332
Wheeler, B (2016). The UK’s EU referendum: All you need to know. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-32810887
Van Ham, Peter. 1999. Europe’s Precarious Centre: Franco-German Cooperation and
the CFSP European Security. European Security 8:1-26
Van Ham, Peter (2016). Brexit: Strategic Consequences for Europe. Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. Retrieved from https://www.clingendael.nl/sites/default/files/Brexit%20Report%20February%202016.pdf
Ever wonder what it’s like to go through Basic Training? Do Drill Sergeants really yell all of the time? Is the gas chamber really that horrible? What’s it like to go to war? How hard is it to return home after?
According to the armytime.com, military suicides have increased since the start of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq with current estimates that a veteran commits suicide every sixty-five minutes (Haiken, 2013). Faced with the stigma of post-traumatic stress disorder, high unemployment rates and loss of the military camaraderie, “many veterans report feeling purposeless upon returning home” (Goldberg, 2011).
- From 1999-2010, the suicide rate in the US population among males was 19.4 per 100,000, compared to 4.9 per 100,000 in females.
- Based on the most recent data available, in fiscal year 2009, the suicide rate among male Veteran VA users was 38.3 per 100,000, compared to 12.8 per 100,000 in females.
Source National Vital Statistics of the US Department of Health and Human Services
“America is losing its battle against suicide by veterans and service members,” authors Dr. Margaret C. Harrell and Nancy Berglass concluded. “And as more troops return from deployment, the risk will only grow.” Suicide is rampant among those who are currently serving too. From 2005 to 2010, approximately one service member committed suicide every 36 hours (Goldberg, 2011). In 2012 the number of deaths by suicide for active duty soldiers hit an all-time high of 349 or almost one a day. That means that during 2012 more soldiers took their own life by suicide than soldiers that lost their life due to combat (Haiken, 2013).
According to Haiken, “69 % of the suicides recorded were by veterans age 50 and older. But another way to look at this is that 31 % of these suicides were by veterans 49 and younger or in other words, by men in the prime of life.”
According to the National Coalition for Homeless Veterans (NCHV), the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) states that the nation’s homeless veterans are predominantly male, with roughly 8% being female. The majority is single; live in urban areas; and suffer from mental illness, alcohol and/or substance abuse, or co-occurring disorders. About 13% of the adult homeless population is veterans. Homeless veterans are younger on average than the total veteran population. Approximately 9% are between the ages of 18 and 30, and 41% are between the ages of 31 and 50. Conversely, only 5% of all veterans are between the ages of 18 and 30, and less than 23% are between 31 and 50 (NCHV, 2013).
- One in seven homeless people previously served in the military
- 1.5 million Veterans are at imminent risk of homelessness
- The 2012 Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR) to Congress, prepared by HUD, estimates there were 62,619 homeless Veterans on a single night in January in the United States
- 33,000 veterans have been given permanent supportive housing by the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Department of Veterans Affairs since 2009
- Almost a third of veterans between the ages of 18 and 24 were unemployed last year, according to unpublished BLS data, the Center for Progress reports
- In 2010, nearly 1 in 10 veterans with disabilities were out of work
- In 2010, nearly 1 million U.S. veterans reported being in poverty over the last year, the Center for American Progress reports
Source: Center for American Progress 2013
What can we do?
According to the NCHV veterans need a coordinated effort that provides secure housing, nutritional meals, basic physical health care, substance abuse care and aftercare, mental health counseling, personal development, job assessment, training and placement assistance.
While we can’t currently do everything that our veterans need, Aspire Indiana is proud to be a part of the InteCare Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSFV) project. The goal of the SSVF Program is to promote housing stability among very low-income Veteran families who reside in or are transitioning to permanent housing, and of course to help our veterans break the cycle of homelessness.
Today the InteCare SSVF project serves veterans in Marion, Madison, Shelby, Johnson, Hancock, Hamilton and Boone Counties. For qualifying veterans, the SSVF program will provide the following services as they relate to housing stability:
- Outreach services
- Case management services
- Peer support services
- Assistance obtaining VA benefits
- Assistance obtaining other public benefits and needed services within the community
- Temporary financial assistance that is necessary to stabilize housing
- Housing counseling & assistance with housing searches
- Financial planning as it relates to stabilizing housing
- Transportation services
- Child care services as it relates to stabilizing housing
To receive supportive services under this program, you must:
- Be a Veteran, or the member of a family in which the head of household, or the spouse of the head of household is a Veteran
- Meet income eligibility requirements: Your household annual income cannot exceed 50% of the area median income (AMI)
- Be homeless or at imminent risk of becoming homeless
What is the definition of a Veteran under the SSVF program?
A Veteran is a person who served in the active military, naval, or air service, and who was discharged or released under conditions other than dishonorable.
For further information or to arrange an eligibility screening appointment please contact (855) 896-4345. SSVF staffs are available to make community presentations and can make arrangements to meet with SSVF applicants at other locations when necessary.
To help spread the word Aspire is working with InteCare to market the program through social media. So I would invite you to visit the new InteCare SSVF page at the link below and to “like” the page. Then share this information with your friends and family.
About the Author
Jerry Landers is the Vice President of Business Development for Aspire Indiana. While the beliefs and opinions expressed in this blog are solely those of Mr. Landers you can learn more about community mental health and how it intersects with business and media at http://www.facebook.com/AspireIndiana
You can also follow Mr. Landers on Twitter @JerryELanders
Eleanor Goldberg, (2011), Veteran Suicide: Are We Losing The Battle? Retrieved Nov 5, 2013 from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/02/suicide_n_1070491.html
Melanie Haiken, (Feb 2013), Suicide Rate Among Vets and Active Duty Military Jumps – Now 22 A Day, Retrieved Nov 5, 2013 from http://www.forbes.com/sites/melaniehaiken/2013/02/05/22-the-number-of-veterans-who-now-commit-suicide-every-day/
3.Kemp, J. & Bossarte, R. (2012). Suicide Data Report, 2012. (Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs) Available from http://www.va.gov/opa/docs/Suicide-Data-Report-2012-final.pdf
Bureau of Labor Statistics (March 2013), Employment Situation of Veterans Summary, Retrieved Nov 5, 2013 from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/vet.nr0.htm
National Coalition for Homeless Veterans (2013), FAQ About Homeless Veterans, Retrieved Nov 5, 2013 from http://nchv.org/index.php/news/media/background_and_statistics/